06-19-16

rkh

mitresg wrote: M8 has nice colour.\n\n\n Thank's, M8 & postprocessing work :)

06-19-16

mitresg

Thank you. The toast and coffee are not great, and, we have been eating the same everyday for a long tie. But, it is a moment's solitude that we value.

06-18-16

mitresg

M8 has nice colour.

06-17-16

mitresg

Thank you. The cakes are reflections from the shop behind us; the girl and the cars are on the other side. I focused on the cakes. It is fortuitous that the girl had just walked past the shelf of cakes and thus appeared to be inside when in fact, she was outsie.

06-17-16

mitresg

Thank you. I am trying to use the 50 Lux for selective focus.

06-16-16

oddgeir

Thanks, Chan! And - good to see your signature again, Terry! I've been off the site for quite some time; had an exhibition in April/May; printing, mounting & wall placement took all of my energy for many weeks . . .

06-16-16

oddgeir

. . love the woman with sunglasses - and the guy up left. I was up front in a bus driving behind this one.

06-15-16

mitresg

Caught it well and yet so sharp. Nice bokeh.

06-15-16

oddgeir

Thanks, Chan! Did you try pressing Full Size? Shows clearly the insane resolution of the Apo Telyt, combined with the 42 MP of the A7rII . . .

06-15-16

mitresg

Nice and sharp. Can see her growl lines.

06-15-16

mitresg

Like the bokeh.

06-14-16

oddgeir

Clean windows on this one . . but I'm not at all convinced I'll be invited to her birthday party . .

06-14-16

mitresg

I value the 109 auto focus although it is not fast enough to capture sudden changes. Frustrating when you spotted a moment and press asap, and then found your image just a step behind. But I miss the tilted LCD the most. Otherwise, the DLUX 109 is the "moment"Get something.

06-14-16

itus49

Dear Chan, in my opinion, the photos in Street style must "talk", not to be perfect, shooting more often, in these cases, it is unrepeatable. So if the camera is pushed to the limit, and the result is not perfect technically, slightly moved with little noise, etc. no matter, the important thing is that the pictures tell us something. This is the case for your photos, perfectly describes the time of the shooting situation, skis elderly already awake were playing (mahjong?), While highs are still asleep. Very very nice. I not really am me to criticize a photo not level or other imperfections. Photos "Street" I repeat must speak. However, the type 109 is a nice car, for me the only flaw is the non-tilting display and the lack of external jack microno (the point of having the opportunity to make 4K film without having a good quality external microphone? ) A hug Italo

06-13-16

mitresg

D-Lux (type 109) ISO 800, 1/80 sec at f2.3; stretching the Lux a bit. Seems OK as I could position myself at the right position, frame for the shot.

06-13-16

mitresg

Interesting use of selective focus.

06-13-16

mitresg

I'd like to add. I have no issue with Lux's (or other half-frame) image quality when shot with proper deliberation. It zoom facility is much appreciated for framing. It is a pleasure to walk and concentrate on selecting a properly framed picture, rather than fooling around with adjustments. Only in dim light and expectation of shoot-first-talk-later that I run into problems.

06-13-16

mitresg

Thank you You obviously have meticulously looked at my photo; your comments gratefully received. It was early in the morning, 6.30 am, and I was shooting with my D-Lux (type 109), not a full-frame camera, 1/125 sec at f2.8. Stretching it a bit, I think. The light was dim and use the D-Lux for its auto-focus system. So, I sacrifice at lot of image quality for quick response. Also the shooting distance was not optimal. Sorry for the poor image quality. It was not the best but I felt that it was better to get something than trying to fiddle with the manual focusing system. Yeah, I agree that may be ISO 800 should have been the limit. Again, appreciate your comment.

06-13-16

itus49

Beautiful image, well composed. But Um, maybe too much PP? Interesting that there is noise on the far right at the bottom of the photo, ISO 1250? Very interesting, again the real picture contradict tests of photo sites is still applicable to the equation that says that noise is inversely proportional to the size of the sensor (with the same number of pixels). Uhm me needed a backup machine to wear during my long trips, I was thinking just a Four Thirds type 109, but I think 800 Iso is the max limit for a 4/3 as ISO 1600 for an APS-C and 3200 for a FF.

06-12-16

gip

I like the contrast. Nice image.