Search options
Cancel
As I am trying to get Leicaimages.com more exposure, I am reposting this older blog post from purerangefinder.com here on Leicaimages as it is 100% Leica related. If you have not read this before, it's am interesting perspective as viewed from your wallet.
The clarity in this frame is immediately apparent. Even wide open at its maximum aperture, the center of the image remains tack sharp. While many ultra fast lenses of the past suffered from a dreamy haze or heavy spherical aberration at f/1.2, the Version 4 Nokton utilizes four aspherical surfaces to effectively correct these issues. The result is a crisp subject that stands out with high contrast, proving that you don't need to stop down to f/2 just to get usable detail.
The bokeh here is where the Voigtlander really shines. With its 12 blade rounded iris, the out of focus areas are rendered with a buttery smoothness that lacks any harsh edges or nervous textures often found in high performance glass.
The fall off from the plane of focus into the background is gradual and natural, creating a cinematic sense of depth.
Specular highlights remain pleasingly round across most of the frame, providing that Noctilux esque look without the heavy vignetting that sometimes causes extreme cat’s eye bokeh in other designs.
The overall rendering can be described as modern with a bit of sould. It captures the environment with exceptional contrast and color saturation, avoiding the clinical, flat look of some contemporary lenses. There is a noticeable 3D pop to the subject.
While online samples of the $9,650 Leica Noctilux highlight its velvety soft bokeh and atmospheric signature, the images from this $1,100 Voigtlander offer a level of performance that makes the massive price gap difficult to justify for pure image quality alone.
In this monochrome rendering, notice how the lens handles the subtle gradations on the metal structures and the soft roll off in the background. The highlights from the overhead lights are contained beautifully, while the deep shadows retain enough detail to provide a sense of place. It produces a classic, high end Leica look where the subject almost feels embossed against the background.
I like repeating this in my writings. But, I believe it is so true that I feel I really need to drive it home. There is a persistent belief in the rangefinder community that you need a dedicated monochrome sensor to achieve this level of tonal depth. This image proves otherwise. You don't need a $9,000 monochrome body to get desireable results. You simply need ...
The Nokton provides the raw optical data the contrast and sharpness that serves as the foundation.
By using a well crafted preset in DXO PhotoLab or Adobe Lightroom, you can manipulate the color channels to create a black and white image that is indistinguishable from one shot on a dedicated mono sensor.
The Voigtlander’s ability to maintain separation between similar shades of gray gives you immense flexibility in post processing. It confirms that the combination of a well built lens and a smart workflow is far more valuable than chasing the most expensive niche hardware.
One of the most impressive technical feats of ths Nokton alonmg with the Noctilux is its 0.5m minimum focus distance. While the rangefinder is only coupled down to 0.7m, the lens continues to focus an additional 20cm, allowing for detail oriented shots that were previously difficult to achieve with fast M mount glass.
Note: The newer 50mm Summilux does offer close focus capabilities as well.
To nail the focus on Freya’s eye at such a razor thin depth of field, I utilized the Visoflex 2 EVF. Using the electronic viewfinder is essential here, it allowed me to bypass the rangefinder's physical limitations and see exactly where the focus falls in real time. The result is a level of precision that makes the 1.2 aperture usable even at its closest range, capturing the fine texture of her fur and the clarity of Freya's eye with startling sharpness. Not bad for a lens $8500.00 less than it's Leica counterpart.
Note: Who needs an EV1 when you can just throw the Visoflex on your M11
While we can look at the specs of the new Leica 35mm Noctilux which also features a 0.5m close focus limit, there is currently a lack of real world evidence for its performance at this extreme. I have yet to find eye samples onthe net. I just need to give it more time. Beleive me, I have scoured the available online samples, and while there are beautiful atmospheric shots, nothing yet shows a true macro style closeup of an eye at 0.5m from the Noctilux.
Without these samples, it is impossible to say if the Leica can maintain the same biting contrast and detail at its minimum focus distance that the Voigtlander shows here. But to be honest, I can only assume it will. Afterall, Leica's name and price for their Noctilux needs to be justifyable. So, If you know where I can find some of these samples please share the info with me.
So at this point, The Voigtlander isn't just a budget alternative in this category, it is currently the proven choice bokeh and close up performance until we see more from the Leica camp.
Notice how the reds and greens are rich and deep, yet the lens maintains enough contrast to show the fine texture of the water droplets and the subtle skin variations on each fruit. The transition from the sharpest point of focus to the soft roll off in the bins is smooth, giving the image a 3D quality that is a hallmark of high end glass.
Even wide open at 1.2, the color accuracy remains remarkably stable across the frame. There is very little of the color fringing or bleeding that often plagues ultra fast lenses in high contrast scenarios.
At an ultra fast 1.2 aperture, the depth of field is razor thin. When working at such close distances, even a slight shift in focus perhaps caused by the separation between the apples or a subtle move after locking on can lead to an image that doesn't quite meet my expectations.
Despite looking fine at first glance, the image lacks the biting clarity seen in other samples. It looks a bit smooth without texture. This could be due to the lens's extreme shallow depth of field or potential focus shift, a known quirk in fast lenses.
It is important to remember that this is only a first run. One underwhelming shot doesn't define a lens, but it does highlight the need for further evaluation to determine if this was a user error in managing the apple separations or a genuine limitation of the lens's optical design at its widest aperture.
Are my expectations just too high? I want to see that Zeiss Distagon 1.4 ZM clinical results in any lens I aquire. You could say that the Zeiss has simply set the standard for everything else. Not even the Summilux FLE can best it.
In this shot, the 35mm Nokton demonstrates its ability to handle artificial textures with a level of grace that makes them feel almost organic.
The way the focus rolls off the petals into the background is buttery and refined. The colors are rendered with a pleasing saturation that gives the pink hues a vibrant, life like pop without appearing digital or over sharpened. Even wide open, the lens maintains high contrast on the fine edges of the flower.
Despite being a fraction of the price of the $9,650 Noctilux, Which I still find difficult to accept, this image holds its own against any of the official or community shared samples I’ve seen of the Leica glass online. While the Leica is celebrated for its rendering, the Voigtlander provides a nearly identical rendering of out of focus highlights and tonal transitions.
It is important to be realistic about the rendering here. While this image doesn't quite reach the clinical, razor edge technical perfection you might expect from a Zeiss Distagon known for its flat field and extreme corner to corner correction, the 1.2 performance isn't bad at all.
The central figures retain good definition and contrast, allowing them to pop against the complex, colorful background. Unlike the Zeiss, which often feels very modern and corrected, the Nokton maintains a slightly softer, more atmospheric fall off that feels right at home on an M body. Do not take this terminology as an excuse for a softer image or inferior image to the Distagon, This is simpy a limitation of super fast lenses.
Once again, the bokeh smoothness is beautiful. The myriad of lights and shelves in the background are transformed into a soft, wash of colors that doesn't distract from the primary subject.
Nailing the focus on those specific central figures amidst such a cluttered environment was made possible by using the Visoflex viewfinder. At 0.5m, even the slightest tilt would have thrown those dolls out of focus, but the EVF allowed for the precision needed to prove that this lens can handle complex scenes wide open.
This image further cements the idea that while this lens may not be a technical instrument in the way a Distagon is, its rendering and character provide a alternative that holds its own against the far more expensive Noctilux samples seen online.
It handles the high contrast challenge of bright lights against a dark sky with incredible poise and minimal flare. While it may not have the clinical, corrected feel of a Zeiss Distagon, it offers a moody, atmospheric rendering that feels far more aligned with the Leica Noctilux aesthetic. In the dark, the $8,500 price gap between this and the Leica feels narrower than ever, as the results speak for themselves.
When you strip away the neon and tungsten hues of a night scene, you are left with a raw study in light and shadow.
Notice how the lens captures the subtle textures of the distressed wooden bench and the reflections in the window panes. The contrast is punchy but controlled, preventing the deep blacks from swallowing the fine details of the shop interior.
The string of lights along the roofline creates a lead in for the eye. Once again, the bokeh smoothness is very pleasant; those out of focus highlights are rendered as soft, gentle glows rather than harsh, distracting spots.
Shooting at 1.2 in the dark gives you the freedom to capture these quiet moments with enough light to keep the grain, or digital noise at bay. This rendering holds its own against any of the high end Noctilux samples I've seen online, showing that the Voigtlander's combination of build quality and optical design is a match for any environment, day or night.
In the end, the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton IV is a lens that demands to be judged on its own merits rather than in the shadow of the Leica crown. While the $9,650 Noctilux remains a symbol of optical luxury, this review, shot entirely at f/1.2, proves that world class rendering, exceptional contrast, and mechanical precision don't have to cost five figures.
We’ve seen the highs, like the buttery smoothness in the portraits of Freya and the tonal depth of the night shots. We’ve also seen the challenges, like the underwhelming results in the apple study that remind us just how demanding a razor-thin depth of field can be. But even with the occasional quirk, the Nokton IV holds its own. It may not offer the clinical, bite to the edge perfection of a Zeiss Distagon, but it offers something arguably more important for the M mount shooter, character, portability, and soul.
For the "fanboys" who once dismissed the Zeiss for its weight while praising the Leica's pedigree, the tables have turned. The Voigtlander is the lighter, more practical everyday f/1.2. It challenges the myth that the extra half stop between f/1.2 and f/1.4 is a visual game changer and instead focuses on what actually ends up in the print.
If you like to wear the Leica badge and the bling for the status it brings, by all means, feel free to do so. It’s a beautiful piece of jewelry. But if you’re arguing that you need it for a superior image, you’re simply in denial. For those who value a lens that is extremely well built, feels right in the hand, and produces undeniably gorgeous bokeh, the Nokton Version 4 is the smarter choice.
Now for my long time number 1 pick, read the following:
The Best 35MM On the M!